<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New V1  Valentine 1 Radar Detector Vs Stalker Radar  Stationary Radar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar</link>
	<description>How to Calculate and Compare Car insurance Premiums?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pyro74boy</title>
		<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/comment-page-1#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>pyro74boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>

						is it ture that are looking at making a moving Laser speed detectionï»¿ unit?
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it ture that are looking at making a moving Laser speed detectionï»¿ unit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAZZYtestsRDs</title>
		<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/comment-page-1#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>JAZZYtestsRDs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>

						agreed its hard toï»¿ tell (on V1) by looking at the &quot;body&quot; since you can send them in for the updates. But i agree this one is right on cue with the instant on. Would need the Serial number on the bottom to lock in exactly what that nice V1 has done to it.
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed its hard toï»¿ tell (on V1) by looking at the &#8220;body&#8221; since you can send them in for the updates. But i agree this one is right on cue with the instant on. Would need the Serial number on the bottom to lock in exactly what that nice V1 has done to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pyro74boy</title>
		<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/comment-page-1#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>pyro74boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>

						I C. LOL I had a buddy let me us it for the video. He saidï»¿ the unit has the new Updates.
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I C. LOL I had a buddy let me us it for the video. He saidï»¿ the unit has the new Updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAZZYtestsRDs</title>
		<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/comment-page-1#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>JAZZYtestsRDs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>

						Seriousky, Compamy, Industty???  You sound like Popeye on the short yellow bus you stupid ass.  Ford sells more cars than Ferrari so I guess Ford is better and worth more.  Welcome to reality, the V1 is the barï»¿ that every detector is compared to.  Call me when Bel or Escort makes a detector that beats the V1 for under $400.
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriousky, Compamy, Industty???  You sound like Popeye on the short yellow bus you stupid ass.  Ford sells more cars than Ferrari so I guess Ford is better and worth more.  Welcome to reality, the V1 is the barï»¿ that every detector is compared to.  Call me when Bel or Escort makes a detector that beats the V1 for under $400.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pyro74boy</title>
		<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/comment-page-1#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>pyro74boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>

						No, it wouldn&#039;t have.  Just go to radardetectordotnet and check out the videos of the Escort 9500i, Escort 9500ix, and Escort 9500ci not alerting to quick pulls of the radar gun.  Escort has failed once again to make a detector that alerts as quickly as the Valentineï»¿ One.  Go hang out with Craig Peterson pyro74boy because nobody believes your BS.
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it wouldn&#8217;t have.  Just go to radardetectordotnet and check out the videos of the Escort 9500i, Escort 9500ix, and Escort 9500ci not alerting to quick pulls of the radar gun.  Escort has failed once again to make a detector that alerts as quickly as the Valentineï»¿ One.  Go hang out with Craig Peterson pyro74boy because nobody believes your BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mesa401</title>
		<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/comment-page-1#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>mesa401</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>

						I am not a speeder, but I just got a V1 a couple of days ago. I got it to help me &quot;pay attention&quot; to my speed. Sometimes myï»¿ foot will unknowingly get heavy. Nice videos....
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a speeder, but I just got a V1 a couple of days ago. I got it to help me &#8220;pay attention&#8221; to my speed. Sometimes myï»¿ foot will unknowingly get heavy. Nice videos&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sniper4usmc</title>
		<link>http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar/comment-page-1#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>sniper4usmc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comparecarinsurancepremiums.com/new-v1-valentine-1-radar-detector-vs-stalker-radar-stationary-radar#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>

						sorry,butï»¿ that is not the newest V1..that is 1.7 least 10+ years old....see that small circle bottom of rear antena=1.7
					</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry,butï»¿ that is not the newest V1..that is 1.7 least 10+ years old&#8230;.see that small circle bottom of rear antena=1.7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
